
Even though the device would mean no more
dependency on fossil fuels, and an end to pollution from
them. How long do you think the inventor would remain
alive?
He would have all the people who are making millions
from oil, products associated with oil burning, and
electrical generating out for his blood. That is why you
have not seen any such device on the market, not
because it is not possible. When there is no more oil to
burn, no other alternative fuel that has already been
made to replace the oil, and the bucks it makes. When
the earth is no longer able to sustain life as we have
now, then you may see free electricity if it is not to late.
The United States Government complains about our
dependence on foreign oil. We would no longer have to
buy foreign oil, unless our own resources were
insufficient. As we would still need oil for other
products like plastics, textiles, medicines, oils, and
grease for the wheels of industry, and cars. We have
become very dependent on these products especially
plastic. Just look around you and start counting how
many things you see that are made out of plastic. Now I
know all plastics do not come from oil. But if we do not
find other source for these products, before the oil runs
out we are not going to have them either.
Since millions of gallons of gas is used daily. If we did
not have to use oil for gas, look how much more we
would have for these other products. So the oil
companies are not going out of business. Oil prices
might drop, but it would mean cheaper plastic and other
products. When prices go down people tend to buy
more, which would still mean good profits for the oil
company's.
Would you pay for gas if you did not have too?
The chief reason people give for not liking EV's is not
enough range and the time it takes to charge. With an
energy source that did not have to be charged, you
would still have to buy the car, pay for the up keep,
repairs, and for the device that produces the power.
You may be saying by now that is impossible there is no
such device. We already have one that is used right
now, but it is not fully practical.
That is solar cells, they require no fuel to produce
electricity, the sun is their fuel source, but they only
work in the day time in good weather. Now suppose you
could do the same thing both night and day with energy
from that same source, and it made no difference if it
was clear or raining. Then it would be practical, and a
boon to us all. Look how much heat the sun radiates
daily to the earth like a chicken on a spit. So much of it
going to waste, when we should be using it for power.
Do you think this would be worth the lose of some profit
to some for the benefits it would provide down the road
for all? I certainly do, and I can hear millions of others
who are screaming YES ! But as long as BIG MONEY,
and GREED rules you will never see it happen.
The money for alternative fuels should be spent on
research to prefect a power source such as this. But we
should not allow this to be come controlled by any large
corporation or the government. For if we do, they will in
the name of profit:
(1) Lie about the cost of production, so only the rich or
maybe the middle class will be able to afford it, and the
little people in this country will never see free anything.
(2) Mess it up on purpose so it wont last and have to be
replaced more often.
Change is coming, but only if we make it happen. I don't
believe that anything is impossible. Today this country
leads and the rest of the world follows. There has been
more change in the last century, then in the last two
thousand years. With a plentiful free Electric supply, we
would see The Golden Age of Man.
Copyright By G.K.Glatz
